Legal Opinion
United States v. McDavid
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided June 23, 1993No. ACM 29287PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HEIMBURG, Judge:
Convicted of violating an Air Force regulation by possessing drug abuse paraphernalia and possessing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)1, appellant has assigned six errors in the trial of his case. Although we find none persuasive, several merit discussion.
I
Appellant asserts, as he did at trial, the specification of Charge I fails to state an offense because the “drug paraphernalia” identified therein are not drug paraphernalia within the meaning of the Air Force regulation cited in the specification. Our review on this issue is limited to the language of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Dennis Essington Green, United States of America v. Daniel S. FranoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. CaporaleUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
- United States v. PainterU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. DaleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993