Legal Opinion

United States v. Swagger

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 30, 1983No. CM 443129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKAY, Judge:

Once again this court is required to adjudicate an issue on appeal that should never have come to be. The President of the appellant’s court-martial at Fort Ord, California, was the installation provost marshal, i.e., the chief law enforcement officer and the officer directly responsible to the Commander (the convening authority) for crime prevention at Fort Ord. Because his challenge for cause of this member, Colonel Fargason, was denied, Specialist Swagger, the appellant, now urges us to set aside his conviction of larceny (from a barracks at Fort Ord) and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. HedgesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  3. United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. BrownU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. HughesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  2. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. BarrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. AlisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  5. United States v. HawksU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API