Legal Opinion

State v. Dowell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree in Medford. In appealing to the Court of Appeals he contended that the trial court erred in excluding testimony by the victim of the robbery, Pamela Chestine, and defendant’s girl friend, Mary McDowell, that Mrs. Chestine had been paid $100 upon her agreement not to testify against defendant. That evidence was offered by defendant to impeach the credibility of Mrs. Chestine, the state’s witness.

The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction by an opinion which rejected the state’s contention that such evidence was not admissible to impeach…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. O'HARRA v. PundtOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. EllsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. StewartOregon Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. MellingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API