Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1985No. CC 10-83-01576; CA A28931; SC S30767PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Defendant appealed his conviction of robbery, assigning as error that the trial court ruled evidence that he was on probation for a previous crime admissible to impeach his testimony for interest. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion, and we allowed review. We affirm.

The issue involves three provisions of the Oregon Evidence Code: OEC 404(2), which prohibits evidence of a defendant’s criminal character; OEC 609(1), dealing with impeaching a defendant in a criminal case with evidence of a prior criminal conviction; and OEC 609-1, dealing with impeaching a defendant in a criminal case…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. Van HooserOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API