Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 9, 1984No. 83-350; No. 83-356PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
Each defendant was charged under RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1983) with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Although the police did not request either defendant to submit to a chemical test, in the district court each claimed a legal and constitutional right to be provided with a sample of breath, blood or urine for testing to indicate blood alcohol content, and each moved to dismiss the complaint for the State’s failure to provide such a sample. In State v. Martin, the Nashua District Court (Harkaway, J.) has made an interlocutory transfer of several questions that raise the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Carlton E. Bryant, United States of America v. William E. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- State v. BootonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- State v. DenneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. SymondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.