State v. Denney
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The defendant appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated, second offense, after a jury trial in the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.), and raises the following question for our review: whether part I, article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution, guaranteeing due process, precludes the State from introducing into evidence a defendant’s refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test (a test), where he had not been warned that his refusal could be used against him at trial. See RSA 265:88-a (Supp. 1986). We hold that the admission of the defendant’s refusal as evidence in this case deprived him…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saviano v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. WinslowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. SymondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.