Legal Opinion

State v. Denney

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1987No. 86-451PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated, second offense, after a jury trial in the Superior Court (O’Neil, J.), and raises the following question for our review: whether part I, article 15 of the New Hampshire Constitution, guaranteeing due process, precludes the State from introducing into evidence a defendant’s refusal to submit to a blood alcohol test (a test), where he had not been warned that his refusal could be used against him at trial. See RSA 265:88-a (Supp. 1986). We hold that the admission of the defendant’s refusal as evidence in this case deprived him…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. NevilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Saviano v. Director, N.H. Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. State v. WinslowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. SymondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API