Legal Opinion

State v. Symonds

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1989No. 87-415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

This is an appeal by the State, pursuant to RSA 606:10, 11(a), of an order by the Goffstown District Court (Pingree, J.) suppressing the results of Kenneth Symonds’ breath test because the police had destroyed a second breath sample. The State asserts that the trial court erred in suppressing the results of the State’s breath test, because the police acted in conformance with the implied consent procedure by informing the defendant that he had thirty days to retrieve the second sample, and that if the sample was not retrieved in that time period it would be destroyed. For the reasons that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. PetkusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GrafSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. In re Bill F.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Bragg v. Director, New Hampshire Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. State v. WinslowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API