Legal Opinion
People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door Sedan
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1940No. Civ. No. 11104PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an application to recall and modify the remittitur heretofore issued in the above-entitled action. The judgment rendered by the trial court was as follows: “Ordered, adjudged and decreed that plaintiff take nothing by its said petition, complaint, and notice of seizure, and that the automobile described as one 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door Sedan Engine No. P4-211565, be returned to defendants and interveners Grace Barry, and Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco, a National Banking Association.” The judgment ordered by this court provided as follows : "That portion of the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Curtin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Dessert Christian CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Boland v. CecilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Innes v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Gayer v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Boland v. CecilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944