Legal Opinion

In Re Miller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1926No. Civil No. 2504PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

— This is an original proceeding in which Bert H. Miller seeks to be admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the courts of this state. His admission has been moved by a member of the Arizona bar, O. H. Young, and in support of this motion the following credentials are presented: First, a certificate of the clerk of the Supreme Court of the state of Idaho showing that he is a member of the bar of that state in good standing, and has been in the active practice in that court for more than ten years last past; second, a letter signed by the five members of the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Montgomery v. State ex rel. EnslenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re ShannonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API