Legal Opinion

Delzell v. Day

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1950No. L. A. 21591PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Raymond and Beatrice Delzell, husband and wife, sued to recover damages for personal injuries assertedly sustained by her and also upon related claims arising out of an automobile accident. A jury found against them but awarded their minor daughter Norma, who was also a party plaintiff, $750 damages for her injuries. In the appeal from the judgments entered upon these verdicts, it is charged that the trial judge committed prejudicial misconduct. The award in favor of Norma is said to be inadequate and the verdict against her parents is challenged as being without substantial evidentiary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Church v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pueblo v. SusoniSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  4. Veronese v. Lucasfilm Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Hays v. ViscomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API