Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Bunch

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1918No. 7963PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RTJMMONS, C.

The parties appear here as they appeared below, and will be .-'o desigr&ted. The xfiaintiff commenced this action against the defendant A. N. Bunch and others to recover judgment upon promissory note for the sum of $350. and for the sum of $10.50 interest represented by coupons attached to the principal note, and to forclose a mortgage upon real estate in Stephens county given to secure said note. The defendant Bunch answered admitting the execution of the note and mortgage sued upon, and alleging that at the time he executed said note and mortgage he executed various…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lambert v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Anderson v. TatroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Gourley v. Pioneer Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. First National Bank of Hobart v. HuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Gunness v. SteverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. A. A. Murphy, Inc. v. BanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Union Savings Ass'n v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Bird Finance Corp. v. LamersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Daniels v. BunchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API