Daniels v. Bunch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Mary A. Daniels (revived in the name of Royal S. Hoxie, as executor of will of Mary A. Daniels, deceased) against Abel N. Bunch and others. From the judgment, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LYONS, C.
This controversy was before this court heretofore in cause No. 7963, Mary A. Daniels, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abel N. Bunch et al., Defendants in Error, 69 Okla. .113. 172 Pac. 1086. This court in its decision in that cause held that the transaction involved therein and herein was usurious, and that the plaintiff had not proved that she was an innocent purchaser without notice of the usurious transaction. Hence the taint of usury affected the contract in plaintiff’s hands.
There is now involved here the question of the application of the law of the case to the facts. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Daniels v. BunchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Morris v. Purcell Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bell v. TackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Richardson v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Carroll v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Boston Mutual Life Insurance v. NewtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Corbin v. BucySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.