Legal Opinion

Nag Enterprises, Inc v. All State Industries, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1979No. Docket 62114PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue raised by this case is whether evidence extrinsic to a written document, unambiguous on its face, may be used to establish that the document did not represent the entire agreement of the parties. The trial court and the Court of Appeals held that the parol evidence rule precluded the use of extrinsic evidence and concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment. We disagree and reverse.

I

Plaintiff NAG Enterprises, Inc., brought this action against defendants All State Industries, Inc., and Meridian Industries, Inc., seeking a judgment against All State on a promissory…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Union Oil Co. v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rood v. Midwest Matrix Mart, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schupp v. Davey Tree Expert Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Tigg Corporation v. Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Cloverdale Equipment Company v. Simon Aerials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Opdyke Investment v. NORRIS GRAIN COMPANYMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API