Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Wells

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1985No. 84-836PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-settled law in this state that a writ of mandamus is the appropriate remedy to enforce the public’s right to gain access to public records under R.C. 149.43. See State, ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., v. Lesak (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 1; State, ex rel. Public Employees Retirees, v. PERS (1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 93 [14 O.O.3d 331]; State, ex rel. Plain Dealer Pub. Co., v. Krouse (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 1 [5 O.O.3d 1]. The issue presently before this court is whether the personnel files of Detective Thompson are subject to inspection as a public record under R.C. 149.43.

A “public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. SavordOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. LesakOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirees, Inc. v. Public Employees Retirement SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API