Legal Opinion
Lash, Admx. v. Mann
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1943No. 29399PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The problem presented by the record in this case requires an interpretation of Section 11663-1, G-eneral Code, as enacted and effective August 19, 1937 (117 Ohio Laws, 515). A condensed summary of the pertinent provisions of this section as then existing in words of the statute itself, is as follows:
“Any judgment for money rendered in a court of record in this state upon any indebtedness, which is secured or evidenced by a mortgage * * * on real property * * * upon which * * * there has been located a dwelling * * * for not more than two families which has been used in whole or in part as a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Montalto v. YeckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pinkney v. Southwick Investments, L.L.C., Unpublished Decision (8-11-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kocsorak v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Squire v. PejsaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Standifer v. ArwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- First Natl. Bank of Pennsylvania v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.