Legal Opinion

Standifer v. Arwood

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1984No. CA83-07-047PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCastle, J.

Prior to the new Ohio Parentage Act, R.C. Chapter 3111, becoming effective on June 29,1982, plaintiff-appellee, Carolyn Standifer, instituted this lawsuit alleging defendant-appellant, Orville Arwood, to be the father of a child born January 18, 1973, named Jack David Hipsher. The case came to trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Warren County, on February 24, 1983, after the effective date of the new Act. The trial court followed the new Act as controlling law.

Before trial, appellant submitted to a genetic test for the purpose of admitting into evidence the results, should his non-paternity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kilbreath v. RudyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brookbank v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Campbell v. PritchardOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Brookbank v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hallock v. HallockOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Martin v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API