Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Squire v. Pejsa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1947No. 30812PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Section 11663-1, General Code, in its present form, became operative in August of 1939 and states in terms that it “shall apply to all actions and proceedings pending and all judgments existing at the effective date thereof.” Such statute was held constitutional in the case of Montalto v. Yeckley, 138 Ohio St., 314, 34 N. E. (2d), 765. See, also, Lash, Admx., v. Mann, 141 Ohio St., 577, 49 N. E. (2d), 689.

It is at once apparent that the controlling question before us is the applicability of Section 11663-1, General Code, to the facts of this case.

So much of the statute as is pertinent to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simon v. Union Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Lash, Admx. v. MannOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Montalto v. YeckleyOhio Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kocsorak v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Matrka v. StephensOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Search Mgt., L.L.C. v. FillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API