Legal Opinion

Dutko v. Planning and Zoning Bd. of City of Milford.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 16, 2008No. AC 28695PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

This certified appeal arises out of the decision of the defendant, the planning and zoning board of the city of Milford (board), not to extend the Milford center design development district (MCDD) to include other nearby properties. The plaintiff, Donna Dutko, appealed from the board’s decision to the Superior Court, which dismissed the appeal, concluding that the board properly declined to exercise its legislative authority to extend the MCDD. The plaintiff now appeals, claiming that (1) the trial court utilized an improper standard of review, (2) the court wrongly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Konigsberg v. BD. OF ALDERMEN OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee & Lamont Realty v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API