Legal Opinion

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 24, 1982No. 65-80CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge

The defendant has requested interlocutory review, pursuant to Rule 53(c)(2)(ii), of an order of Trial Judge Bernhardt remanding this contract case to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("the Board”) for a trial de novo before a different hearing member of the Board. The trial judge took the action because of ex parte contacts between the Board member who wrote the Board’s opinion and attorneys for the government.

The defendant does not oppose a remand to the Board. It argues, however, (1) that only the court and not one of its trial judges may direct such a remand, and (2) that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Regan v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Bio-Medical Applications of Lewiston, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Orion Electronic Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API