Legal Opinion

Todd Construction, L.P. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 22, 2009No. 07-324 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

Todd Construction sued in this court alleging that the negative performance evalúa-*238tions it received after repairing the roofs of buildings at the Seymour Johnson Air Force base were procedurally improper, unfair and inaccurate, and that Todd was legally entitled to procedurally proper, fair and accurate evaluations. The Government moved to dismiss Todd’s complaint as failing to assert a “claim” within the meaning of the Contracts Disputes Act (“CDA”), which, if true, would have deprived the court of jurisdiction over the complaint, as well as failing…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Glenn Defense Marine (Asia), PTE Ltd. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API