Legal Opinion

Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 15, 1989No. 578-86 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

I

At issue in this case is the finality, under Wunderlich Act standards, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1982), of a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denying claims of both contracting parties: Arnold’s demand for equitable adjustments in contract price and time based on various claims of Government-caused delay, disruption, and extra work, and the Government’s demand for liquidated damages based on a 13-month delay in the completion of construction.1

*3On the basis of the parties’ briefs and the oral argument, the court concludes that, with respect to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  2. M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. P & D Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Fred A. Arnold, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API