Legal Opinion

In re the Foreclosure of Hardin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s sole assignment of error is that Judge Moore should not have signed said judgment because “a copy of each appeal was mailed to R. Paul Jamison, attorney for respondents, and receipt of same was acknowledged in open court.”

There is no exception to any of the court’s findings of fact. Weddle v. Weddle, 246 N.C. 336, 98 S.E. 2d 302. Hence, we must accept as established the facts set forth in the court’s findings. In re Estate of Cogdill, 246 N.C. 602, 99 S.E. 2d 785.

The statement, quoted above, appears only in appellant’s assignment of error. Nothing in the record supports it. Thus,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Weddle v. WeddleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hagins v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Hagins v. South Atlantic Bonded Warehouse Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API