Legal Opinion

Tamsen v. Weber

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 88-508PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

Plaintiffs have appealed from a summary judgment and from the superior court’s subsequent denial of their motion for new trial. The central issue presented is whether the defendant psychiatrist, Dr. George Weber, owed a duty to protect the plaintiff, Margaret Tamsen, from the violent acts of a person committed to the Arizona State Hospital, Kevin Trahan, who was in the care and custody of Dr. Weber. Because we hold that such a duty exists, we reverse the summary judgment, and remand for trial on whether Dr. Weber’s conduct breached that duty and whether his breach…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ortega v. ReynaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Wertheim v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Riddle v. Arizona Oncology Services., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Carr v. HowardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API