Tamsen v. Weber
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a summary judgment and from the superior court’s subsequent denial of their motion for new trial. The central issue presented is whether the defendant psychiatrist, Dr. George Weber, owed a duty to protect the plaintiff, Margaret Tamsen, from the violent acts of a person committed to the Arizona State Hospital, Kevin Trahan, who was in the care and custody of Dr. Weber. Because we hold that such a duty exists, we reverse the summary judgment, and remand for trial on whether Dr. Weber’s conduct breached that duty and whether his breach…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ortega v. ReynaNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Wertheim v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Riddle v. Arizona Oncology Services., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Carr v. HowardMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.