Legal Opinion

Beach v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1983No. 16285-PRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Anarinda Beach (Beach) was injured when she was struck by a car as she stepped into the street to avoid a tree which was blocking the sidewalk. Beach brought a tort action against the City of Phoenix (City) alleging the City had been negligent in allowing the tree to remain on the sidewalk. The City moved for a summary judgment and argued that it owed no duty to Beach since the tree was an open and obvious danger and that the City could not be held liable absent a showing it had formal notice of the obstruction of the sidewalk. The trial court granted the summary judgment and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gulf Insurance v. GrishamArizona Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hamman v. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API