Legal Opinion
Durrant v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF HARTFORD
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 2, 2007No. SC 17733PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Sharon Durrant, appealed from the judgment of the trial court rendered following the *94granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, the board of education (board) of the city of Hartford and certain city of Hartford employees,1 which was based on governmental immunity under General Statutes § 52-557n (a) (2) (B) and Connecticut common law.2 The plaintiff claimed that the defendants’ failure to remove a puddle of water on an outside staircase of a public school attended by her child was an act that had subjected her, as an identifiable member…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Fleming v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Strycharz v. CadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Cotto v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.