Legal Opinion
Fleming v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 4, 2007No. SC 17627PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The named plaintiff, Sylvia Fleming, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court holding that: (1) the individual defendants James Dixon and Susie Dixon (Dixons), the owners of a multifamily house in which the plaintiff occupied an apartment, did not violate Connecticut’s entry and detainer statute, General Statutes § 47a-43, 1 by requesting that the police remove the plaintiff from the apartment on May 7, 1998; and (2) the municipal defendants, the city of Bridgeport (city) and several of its police officers, were entitled to qualified immunity for allegations that they…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Brooks v. SweeneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bonington v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Gregory Baldwin v. City of Estherville, Iowa Matt Reineke, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police Department and Matt Hellickson, Individually and in His Official Capacity as an Officer of the Estherville Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.