Legal Opinion

Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 44,090 Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 21, 1996No. 95-5122PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A (Stin-son) appeals the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing its complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1 We affirm the dismissal.

BACKGROUND

Stinson, a law firm, while representing an accident victim in his dealings with the Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co. (Provident), learned of assertedly improper practices in Provident’s Medicare billing practices. Stinson brought a qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729-33, in the United States District Court for the Southern…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roland A. Leblanc v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Moore v. Public Defenders OfficeUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Scannell v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  4. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API