Suske v. Straka
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
This is an action to recover upon a promissory note in which the trial court directed a verdict for defendant upon the case made by plaintiff.
The appeal presents for decision the following questions:(1) Whether the statutory presumption that a promissory note was issued for a valuable consideration persists after it has been shown by undisputed and uncontradicted evidence that the note was a “present” from the maker to the payee;(2) Whether, where the evidence adduced by plaintiff conclusively shows that the defendant, maker of a promissory note, gave it to the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chipman v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.