Legal Opinion

Suske v. Straka

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1949No. 34,966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This is an action to recover upon a promissory note in which the trial court directed a verdict for defendant upon the case made by plaintiff.

The appeal presents for decision the following questions:(1) Whether the statutory presumption that a promissory note was issued for a valuable consideration persists after it has been shown by undisputed and uncontradicted evidence that the note was a “present” from the maker to the payee;(2) Whether, where the evidence adduced by plaintiff conclusively shows that the defendant, maker of a promissory note, gave it to the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chipman v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. McGovern v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Dumas v. Kessler & Maguire Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Neubauer v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API