Lemagie v. Acme Stamp Works
Washington Supreme Court
Ci’oss-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 31, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in garnishment proceedings, after a trial upon an agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Respondent and. cross-appellant moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that another garnishee defendant, who appeared in answer to the writ of garnishment against it, was not sex’ved with xxotice of appeal; that garnishee defendant was -in no way interested in the controversy between these parties, and not a party adverse to the appellant or cross-appellant. Seattle Trust Co. v. Pitner, 17 Wash. 365, 49 Pac. 505. The motion is therefore denied.
In answer to a writ of garnishment, sei'ved. upon it by the plaintiff in the principal suit on August 5, 1915, the garnishee appellant, here…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hills v. JosephCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Creditors Collection Ass'n v. BisbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Puget Sound Dressed Beef & Packing Co. v. JeffsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Seattle Trust Co. v. PitnerWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Frieze v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bassett v. McCartyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Northern Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- United States v. One Machine for Corking BottlesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
- Dean v. OpdyckeWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- In re FrenchDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1918
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.