Legal Opinion

Dean v. Opdycke

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1929No. 21572. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This appeal presents a claim of exemption of a garnisheed indebtedness. The plaintiff, Dean, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery of an alleged balance of $247, due upon a prQmissory note executed and delivered to him by the defendant, Opdycke, evidencing a community debt of Opdycke and wife. Dean caused a writ of garnishment to be issued in the action, directed to the Transport Motor Company, requiring it to answer as to any indebtedness owing by it to Opdyeke and wife. The motor company answered the writ, stating that it was then indebted to Opdyeke…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Chehalis County BankWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. McKee v. McNeillWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. Citizens National Bank of West HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Mendoza v. Acme Transfer & Storage Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pacific Coast Adjustment Co. v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API