Legal Opinion

Frieze v. Powell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1914No. 11271PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered February 26, 1913, upon findings in favor of a garnishee, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, at whose instance a writ of garnishment was issued, from an order vacating a default judgment against the garnishee defendant and from the judgment rendered thereafter upon the trial. The record discloses the following facts: On August 19, 1912, the plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $461.15 against the defendants Powell and wife. Powell was, at the time, employed by the garnishee defendant, Merle & Heaney Manufacturing Company. To- avoid confusion, we shall designate the parties throughout as plaintiff, defendant and garnishee. The garnishee is a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Tatum v. GeistWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Teater v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Spoar v. Turn-VereinWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bambrick v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lemagie v. Acme Stamp WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bassett v. McCartyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Paste-Ups Unlimited, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  4. Rule v. SomervillWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lowe v. N. B. Clark & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API