Legal Opinion

General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 19, 1961No. 236-56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On May 4, 1960, the court rendered an opinion in this case, together with findings of fact, holding that plaintiff was entitled to recover and entering judgment to that effect. 277 F.2d 929. The amount of recovery was to be determined in further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38(c), 28 U.S.C.A. On April 21, 1961, pursuant to a memorandum report of the trial commissioner judgment was entered for plaintiff in the sum of $787,631.69 representing the amount due plaintiff under the court’s decision of May 4, 1960. This judgment was without prejudice to plaintiff’s claim with regard to interest on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carter v. Liquid Carbonic Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  4. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. General Motors Corp., Frigidaire Div. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Usibelli Coal Mine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Abell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. General Motors Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  5. General Motors Corp.United States Court of Claims · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API