Legal Opinion

Carter v. Liquid Carbonic Pacific Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 20, 1938No. 8646PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court. It involves seven claims for the refund of an aggregate sum of $3,811.60 paid as manufacturer’s excise taxes to appellant’s decedent, as Collector of Internal Revenue, upon carbonic acid gas manufactured and sold by appellee during 1933 and 1934. On August 11, 1934, appellee filed seven separate claims for the refund of the taxes so assessed and collected. Each claim was identical, except as to amounts, and contained only the following grounds:

“The tax in question was assessed on carbonic acid gas sold by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cornell v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Cadwalader v. ZehSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bulova Watch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Fleming v. Hawkeye Pearl Button Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  4. Giustina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. John F. Cawrse Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API