Legal Opinion

General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 4, 1960No. 236-56PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for refund of excise taxes exacted on the price for which it sold refrigerators to its distributors. It says it is entitled to deduct, as an allowance, the amount it refunded to the distributors, for transmittal to the retailers, on account of the cost of advertising the product in the localities of the various retailers. It relies on the provisions of section 3443 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which reads:

“§ 3443. Credits and refunds
“(a) A credit against tax under this chapter, or a refund, may be allowed or made—
“(2) to any person who has paid tax under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Ayer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Waterman-Bic Pen Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1960
  3. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. General Motors Corporation, Frigidaire Division v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API