Legal Opinion

Usibelli Coal Mine v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 8, 2002No. Nos. 99-267T, 99-516T, 00-551TPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

This case presents an important issue of first impression. In its ground-breaking decision in Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United States, 205 F.3d 1369 (Fed.Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1065, 121 S.Ct. 2214, 150 L.Ed.2d 208 (2001), the Federal Circuit held that this court had jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, over a suit filed by a taxpayer seeking monetary damages stemming from its payment of an excise tax found violative of the Export Clause of the Constitution, art. I, § 9, cl. 5. In so opining, the court held that such a suit for damages could…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. McNeil v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API