Legal Opinion

Abell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 25, 1975No. 261-72; No. 371-73PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge

Plaintiffs, wage board employees of the Bonneville Power Administration of the Department of the Interior (hereinafter Bonneville), claim in this suit that they are being denied 25 per cent Sunday premium pay required by Section *211405(f) of the Federal Employees Salary Act of 1966 (5 TJ.S.C. § 5544(a)) and alternatively that if they are not entitled to 25 per cent Sunday premium pay under this act, they are nonetheless entitled to it because “the prevailing rates in the industry provide for premium pay for Sunday work” and Bonneville is required to fix compensation for plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  2. Internal Revenue Service v. District of Columbia (In Re WPG, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. RAUHAUSER v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Bunge Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API