Legal Opinion

Elwood v. State Accident Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1985No. SC S 30606 CA A27555 WCB Case No. 80-10264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

The occupational disease law provides that a worker is entitled to compensation as for an “injury,” ORS 656.804, if the worker contracts a disease that “arises out of and in the scope of the employment, and to which an employe is not ordinarily subjected or exposed other than during a period of regular employment therein.” ORS 656.802. Mental illness can be an occupational disease, James v. SAIF, 290 Or 343, 624 P2d 565 (1981), if it arises from actual rather than imaginary job-related conditions. McGarrah v. SAIF, 296 Or 145, 675 P2d 159 (1983). The present case involves the question under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Elwood v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adsitt v. Clairmont Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. NoffsingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Globe MacHine v. YockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API