Bay Area Citizens v. Association of Bay Area Governments
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEWART, J.
The primary issue raised by this appeal is whether the Bay Area agencies newly charged by state law with adopting a plan to reduce regional greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light trucks over the coming decades should have relied on emissions reductions already expected from preexisting statewide mandates to fulfill their statutory obligation, rather than adopting regional strategies to reduce emissions beyond those already expected from the statewide mandates. We conclude, as did the trial court, that the relevant agencies correctly declined to count statewide…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated ProceedingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- South of Mkt. Cmty. Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Covina Residents for Responsible Dev. v. City of Covina, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. City of Sacramento, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Covina Residents for Responsible Development v. City of CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.