Legal Opinion
Sierra Club v. State Board of Forestry
California Supreme Court
Decided July 21, 1994No. S026367PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Pacific Lumber Company submitted two timber harvesting plans covering old-growth forest in Humboldt County to the Department of Forestry (department). In response to a request by the Department of Fish and Game (Fish and Game), the department asked Pacific Lumber Company to provide information on old-growth-dependent wildlife species within the plan areas. Pacific Lumber Company refused to provide the requested information on the ground that it was not specified in the rules promulgated by the Board of Forestry (board). (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 895 et seq. [hereafter,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Rural Landowners Assn. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- East Peninsula Education Council, Inc. v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by120 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Lee v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.