Legal Opinion

Hill Grocery Co. v. Nelson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1944No. 6 Div. 57PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellee sued appellant to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. From a judgment for plaintiff this appeal was taken.

There are six assignments of error noted and made by appellant upon this record.

The first and second assignments of error relate to the judgment of the trial court upon defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint.

The complaint as originally filed, and as amended, contains only one count. This count of the complaint was in Code form, Code of Alabama, 1940, Tit. 7, Sec. 223, No. 20, and was good and sufficient. The trial court did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Alabama Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Jones v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale v. LayerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Hill Grocery Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API