Legal Opinion

Jones v. Pritchett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1936No. 4 Div. 893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action at law in which plaintiff recovered a judgment, and defendant made a motion for a new trial.

The motion for a new trial is the one which is argued first — assignment No. 10. The general rule is that the ruling on such motion must appear in the bill of exceptions showing that an exception was reserved. Some of the cases are: Drennen Motor Co. v. Patrick, 225 Ala. 36, 141 So. 681; Southern Wood Preserving Co. v. Mc-Camey, 218 Ala. 201, 118 So. 393; Martin v. State, 216 Ala. 160, 113 So. 602 (case No. 1). We find no exception to the ruling which appears anywhere…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNeil v. Munson S. S. LinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CorbittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Drennen Motor Co. v. PatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Frith v. StuddardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Cox v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Hill Grocery Co. v. NelsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Cox v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API