Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 8 Div. 600PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Count 1 claims of defendants damages “for maliciously and without probable cause therefor, causing the plaintiff to be indicted by the grand jury * * * on a charge in substance: (setting out the indictment for arson) and to • be arrested under a warrant or writ of arrest issued * * * . on said indictment,” etc.

The Code form of complaint for malicious prosecution claims damages “for maliciously, and without probable cause therefor, causing the plaintiff to be arrested under a warrant issued by E. F., a justice of the peace, on the -day of-, on a charge of larceny (or as the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Berry v. City of New York Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Sanders v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. LaneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Prince v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. SundaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Blake v. Barton Williams, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API