Legal Opinion

Hale v. Layer

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1945No. 4 Div. 862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

As indicated by assignments of error, the record in this case presents only two questions: (1) The refusal to the appellant of the affirmative charge. (2) The denial of the primary court to grant appellant’s motion for a new trial.

At about 10 o’clock on a cold February morning in 1944, appellant’s home was destroyed by fire. Appellee and his wife occupied a downstairs apartment in the dwelling.

This suit was filed by appellee for the damages to personal property which, in his complaint, he claims he suffered by reason of the negligence of appellant in causing the house to burn.

As…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Western Railway of Alabama v. MutchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  4. William E. Harden, Inc. v. HardenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. AtkinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. North Carolina Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Morgan Plan Co., Inc. v. BeverlyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Hale v. LayerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API