Martin v. State

In the case at bar we need not concern ourselves with the rulings made by the court on the main trial of this appellant, as it clearly appears that such trial proceeded throughout without error of a reversible nature. Moreover, it does not appear that insistence is made by appellant's counsel of reversible error in any of the rulings of the court invoked upon the main trial.

It is strenuously insisted, however, that the court should have granted a new trial to defendant upon the showing made relative to this matter, and that in overruling or denying said motion the court committed grievous and…