Legal Opinion
Shain v. Armour & Co.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided June 17, 1943No. 256PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Alfred C. Shain, brought this action on behalf of himself as an employee of the defendant, Armour & Company, and on behalf of approximately 57 other employees of the defendant to recover for the “time and a half” benefits of Section 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201 through 219. Following a pre-trial conference, the Court was asked to r.ule on the applicability of the Act to the plaintiffs as a whole, to certain groups of individuals of the plaintiffs, and to different individuals of the plaintiffs, considering in each case…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Waialua Agr. Co. v. ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
- Wyatt v. Holtville Alfalfa Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Waialua Agricultural Co. v. Ciraco ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1948
- Colbeck v. Dairyland Creamery Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.