Legal Opinion
Waialua Agricultural Co. v. Ciraco Maneja
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 8, 1948No. Civ. 787PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZGER, District Judge.
Arising from diverse view, such as to create an actual controversy, of the intent, meaning, and application of certain sections of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., the plaintiff, as a fairly representative plantation of the sugar industry in Hawaii, brought this action by agreement with collective bargaining representatives of certain of its employees, praying for a declaratory judgment to determine its rights under the Act as an employer, and the rights of the defendant-employees named, as well as all other of its employees engaged in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowie v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Vives v. SerrallesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waialua Agr. Co., Limited v. Maneja Maneja v. Waialua Agr. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Waialua Agr. Co. v. ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
- Waialua Agricultural Co., Limited v. ManejaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- McComb v. Del ValleDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1948
- Hammonds v. J. W. Broom & SonsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.