Libby, McNeill & Libby v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The question here is whether the production of citrus pulp cattle feed and citrus molasses simultaneously performed during the processing of fresh citrus fruits into canned or concentrated frozen juices or fruit entitled the Employer to an Fair Fair Labor Standards Act § 7(b) (3) “seasonal industry” exemption. It is conceded that for these two by-product operations the Employer is entitled to the § 7(c) exemption.
At the outset it simplifies our understanding to contrast in a gross way these two exemptions 1 §§ 7(b) (3) and 7(c). Section 7(c), if applicable, is so…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Alstate Construction Co. v. DurkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitchell v. Trade Winds Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Davis Bros., Inc. v. MarshallDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Etc. v. Twin City Foods, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Continental Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.