Gaffney v. Sederberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Itasca county against John Seder-berg and Herman Sederberg, Samuel Simpson, The North Land Pine Company and certain pine saw logs to recover $1,313.07 for labor in hauling logs, and to enforce a lien upon the logs. Defendant Simpson demurred to the complaint and defendant land company demurred to the complaint. From an order, McClenahan, J., overruling demurrers to the complaint, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The here material allegations of the complaint are to the effect following:
The defendant the North Land Pine Company (hereafter referred to as the Land Company) was and is the owner of the logs and timber hereinafter referred to. On June 29, 1908, the defendants Sederberg & Son, as parties of the first part, and defendant Simpson, as party of the second part, entered into a written contract, which is a part of the complaint. The complaint recites that the Land Company purchased the timber of the United States, and in doing so agreed with it that in the logging of the timber the Land Company…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. GutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Kramer v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Follansbee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Guilder v. Town of OtsegoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Mourea v. RhudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Peterson v. ParviainenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Wood v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Prouty Lumber & Box Co. v. McGuirkOregon Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.