Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Parviainen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1928No. 26,577PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal from a judgment entered against the three defendants on April 25, 1927, for $1,935.37.
Defendants Andrew Jarvi and Gust Lahti were copartners, doing business under the firm name of Jarvi & Lahti. This action was brought to recover on 17 wage claims, one of which was originally the plaintiff’s and the others owned by him by virtue of assignments. Jarvi & Lahti were the owners of a quantity of timber which they desired manufactured into lath. Defendant Parviainen owned a portable lath sawmill. In December, 1925, a written contract was entered into between Parviainen, as party of the first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jefferson v. AschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- St. Paul Foundry Co. v. EvensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Gaffney v. SederbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barrett v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- La Mourea v. RhudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- John E. Massengale, Trustee v. Transitron Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.