Guilder v. Town of Otsego
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Berry, J.
Chapter 100, Sp. Laws 1870, appoints three persons, residents of Hennepin and Wright counties, bridge commissioners “ for the purpose of contracting for and superintending the rebuilding of the bridge across Crow river, near its mouth, between the town of Dayton, in the county of Hennepin, and the town of Otsego, in the county of Wright.” The commissioners are to contract for and generally superintend the construction of the bridge, the total cost of which is not to exceed three thousand dollars. The contract is to be in writing, and- copies of the same are to be filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bingham v. Board of Supervisors of Winona CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
- Murphy v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by20 opinions
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Roske v. IlykanyicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- State v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Maltby v. TautgesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.